Testosterone lowers thyroxine-binding globulin, so a man on TRT can post a low total T4 with a completely normal thyroid. That one binding-protein effect explains more alarming thyroid panels in this population than thyroid disease does — and it is why this panel is read on free hormones, not totals.
TSH is not a thyroid hormone. It is made by the pituitary, and it is the brain's instruction to the thyroid rather than the thyroid's output. The gland itself secretes mostly thyroxine (T4) and a little triiodothyronine (T3); most of the T3 circulating in you was made outside the thyroid, by enzymes stripping an iodine off T4 in liver, kidney and other tissue. Reverse T3 comes off the same T4 pool by a different cut and does nothing. TPO and thyroglobulin antibodies are not hormones at all — they are immune proteins aimed at the gland.
The other split on the panel is bound against free. Well over 99 per cent of the T4 and T3 in blood is stuck to carrier proteins — thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG) mainly, then transthyretin and albumin. A total T4 counts everything, bound and unbound. A free T4 estimates the small unbound fraction, which is the part that reaches tissue. Both are on this panel. They are not the same measurement and they do not fail in the same way.
Established clinical use TSH is the first test for a reason, and it is not tradition. Because the pituitary is itself reading thyroid hormone and responding to it, TSH integrates the signal and amplifies it, so it moves before free T4 has visibly left its range. Guideline practice is to use serum TSH as the initial test for suspected primary thyroid dysfunction, and as the test used to monitor replacement once someone is on it 1. Free T4 is the confirming measurement, not the screening one.
Established clinical use Androgens lower thyroxine-binding globulin, and this has been measured directly rather than inferred. When women with normal thyroid function were given an androgen, serum TBG and total T4 fell over the following weeks while free T4 and TSH did not move at all 2. Oestrogen does the opposite — it raises TBG, and hypothyroid women started on oestrogen needed more thyroxine because more of it was being held in the bound compartment 3. Less carrier protein, less total hormone, same free hormone.
For a man on testosterone that has one very practical consequence. A total T4 sitting at the bottom of the reference range, or under it, alongside a normal TSH and a normal free T4, is the expected binding-protein signature of androgen exposure. It is not hypothyroidism, and it does not become hypothyroidism because the number printed in bold on the report. Total T3 shifts the same way for the same reason. That is why this panel is read on free hormones, and why the totals — which the app still stores, because your report prints them — are the weaker two numbers on it.
There is one group for whom this matters a great deal rather than a little: people already taking thyroid hormone. In the same study, hypothyroid women on a settled replacement dose became biochemically over-replaced once the androgen was added, because their dose had been fitted to the old binding-protein state 2. The oestrogen study is the mirror image 3. So if you take levothyroxine, liothyronine or desiccated thyroid and you start, stop or substantially change testosterone — or change an aromatase inhibitor, which moves oestrogen — the panel is worth repeating a few weeks later. What happens to the thyroid dose after that is a decision for whoever prescribes it, and they need to be told the testosterone changed.
Established clinical use The relationship between TSH and free T4 is roughly logarithmic rather than proportional: a small movement in free T4 produces a large movement in TSH. Analysis of repeated measurements within individuals found that the log TSH to free T4 relationship is predominantly linear inside a given person, even though it looks messy and non-linear once you pool a population 4. The useful reading is that TSH is a sensitive amplifier of your thyroid state, and that your own serial values carry more information than where you happen to sit in someone else's distribution.
An amplifier is also twitchy. TSH has a diurnal rhythm, moves with acute illness, and lags a real change in thyroid hormone by weeks rather than days. A single out-of-range TSH with normal free hormones is a reason to repeat the test, not a diagnosis. It is also the number watched over time on this panel, which is why TSH sits on the monitoring list for levothyroxine, liothyronine, desiccated thyroid and lithium in the app rather than being a one-off screen.
Every pattern above is a reason to take the panel, the units and the assay to the clinician who manages your thyroid, not a reason to adjust anything on your own. A thyroid result read in isolation from symptoms and from the rest of the panel is exactly the kind of number that gets treated when it should have been repeated.
Off-label or community practice About the 0.5–2.5 optimal band in the fact box: it is a convention and should be treated as one. It draws on population data in which most people without thyroid antibodies sit comfortably below 2.5, and on a long-running argument that an upper reference limit near 4.0 is inflated by undiagnosed autoimmune disease sitting inside the reference population. That argument has been made carefully and repeatedly, and it has not been settled 5. The band is non-diagnostic. Being outside it is not a finding, being inside it is not a clean bill of health, and the interval your own laboratory printed against your own result on its own analyser beats both. A TSH outside that interval on repeat testing is the version worth taking to the clinician who prescribes for you.
Established clinical use Reverse T3 is what you get when an enzyme takes the iodine off the inner ring of T4 instead of the outer one. It is inactive. It rises reliably when the body down-regulates thyroid hormone turnover, and the clearest demonstration is nutritional: in fasted men serum T3 fell by roughly half with a reciprocal rise in reverse T3, while a hypocaloric diet that removed carbohydrate lowered T3 without significantly raising rT3 6. Illness, surgery, injury and sustained energy deficit push the same way, a pattern usually called non-thyroidal illness syndrome 7.
Animal-only or theoretical What is not established is the model built on top of that. The "reverse T3 dominance" story — that rT3 blocks T3 at the receptor, producing tissue hypothyroidism behind a normal TSH, and that the free T3 to reverse T3 ratio is therefore a target to be corrected — is a mechanistic extrapolation. It has not been shown to identify people who benefit from treatment. The American Thyroid Association's position is that in healthy, non-hospitalised people, measuring reverse T3 does not help determine whether hypothyroidism exists and is not clinically useful 8, and rT3 testing is not recommended in professional practice guidelines for thyroid function 9.
That is worth saying plainly rather than sneering at, because the observation underneath it is real. The people who order rT3 are usually tired, usually dieting or training hard, and usually holding a panel that looks slightly off — and a low T3 with a high rT3 is precisely what a body under sustained energy restriction produces. An aggressive cut, a GLP-1-driven drop in intake, a heavy training block or a recent illness will all do it. The finding is genuine; what it means is that you are in a deficit or unwell, not that your thyroid needs a drug. This is why the app publishes a reference range for rT3 and deliberately publishes no optimal band — there is no target here worth naming, and inventing one would imply a treatment decision the evidence does not support. If the pattern persists once intake and illness are accounted for, that is a conversation with your prescribing clinician about why, not a number to chase.
Established clinical use Thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin antibodies answer a different question from the rest of the panel: not whether the gland is working, but why. Their value is prognostic. In the twenty-year follow-up of the Whickham cohort, a raised TSH alone and positive thyroid antibodies alone each raised the odds of developing overt hypothyroidism substantially, and the two together raised them far more than either did on its own — with a considerably larger effect in men than in women 10. A positive TPO alongside a normal TSH usually changes nothing this month. It changes how closely the panel is watched, and for how long.
Established clinical use Biotin is the most under-known cause of an alarming thyroid panel in a supplement-taking population, and this is a supplement-taking population. Most automated thyroid immunoassays run on biotin–streptavidin chemistry, and circulating biotin from a hair-skin-and-nails product or a stacked B-complex competes with it. The direction of the error depends on the assay format: competitive assays, which is how free T4 and free T3 are measured, read falsely high, while sandwich assays, which is how TSH is measured, read falsely low 11. The result imitates hyperthyroidism well enough that published cases were worked up and diagnosed as Graves' disease before anyone asked about the supplement 12. The FDA has issued guidance to diagnostic manufacturers on testing for and disclosing biotin interference precisely because it is neither rare nor obvious 13.
Method matters in a quieter way too. Free T4 and free T3 on a routine panel are estimates produced by an immunoassay, not direct measurements of unbound hormone, and different manufacturers' methods disagree with each other and with equilibrium dialysis followed by mass spectrometry, with the gap widest away from the middle of the range 14. They are also sensitive to abnormal binding proteins: in familial dysalbuminaemic hyperthyroxinaemia, where an albumin variant binds T4 unusually, current free hormone immunoassays return wrong answers 15. That is the same class of problem as the TBG shift at the top of this page, and it is why a free T4 that moved when you changed laboratories may have moved because the assay changed rather than because you did.
So the working rule for a panel that does not match how you feel is unglamorous. Repeat it, on the same platform as last time, after stopping biotin, and tell the laboratory what you take — supplements and testosterone included. A result that survives that is worth acting on; one that does not was an artefact, and acting on it would have been the mistake. What to do about a result that does survive is not something a reference page can tell you, because the answer turns on your antibodies, your symptoms, your other medication and your own laboratory's intervals. That decision belongs to the clinician who prescribes your thyroid medication — and if you are also on testosterone, they need to know that too, because the two panels move each other.
Generated by matching this marker's own aliases against the monitoring note on every compound in the app's reference, so the list is the app's, not an author's.
Testosterone lowers thyroxine-binding globulin, the main carrier protein for thyroid hormone in blood. Less carrier means less bound hormone, so the total falls while the unbound fraction that actually reaches tissue stays where it was. A low total T4 with a normal free T4 and a normal TSH on testosterone is the expected pattern, not a thyroid problem. Total T3 behaves the same way.
It is a different situation if you already take thyroid hormone. That dose was fitted to your previous binding-protein state, so a change in testosterone can shift the panel enough to matter. Repeat the panel a few weeks after the change and take it to the clinician who prescribes the thyroid medication.
Reverse T3 tells you the body is down-regulating thyroid hormone turnover — from illness, injury, fasting or a sustained energy deficit. That signal is real and reproducible. What it does not do is diagnose hypothyroidism or identify people who benefit from treatment, and it is not recommended in professional guidelines for thyroid function testing.
TherapyLog carries a reference range for reverse T3 and no optimal band, deliberately. There is no target here worth naming, and publishing one would imply a treatment decision the evidence does not support.
It is inside almost every laboratory's reference interval and outside the 0.5–2.5 band you will see quoted in community discussion. That band is a convention drawn from population data and an unsettled argument about the upper reference limit. It is not a guideline threshold and it is non-diagnostic — being outside it is not a finding.
What matters more is the interval your own laboratory printed on your own report, whether the value is stable across repeat draws, whether your free T4 is normal, and whether you have thyroid antibodies. A TSH outside your own lab's interval on repeat testing is the version worth taking to your clinician.
Yes, and it is the first thing to rule out on a panel that looks dramatic but does not match how you feel. Most automated thyroid immunoassays run on biotin–streptavidin chemistry. High circulating biotin pushes free T4 and free T3 falsely high and TSH falsely low, producing a picture that closely resembles hyperthyroidism.
Published cases have been worked up and diagnosed as Graves' disease before anyone asked about the supplement. Stop biotin before a draw and tell the laboratory you were taking it. Assays vary in how susceptible they are, so the laboratory is the right place to ask.
Not on its own. Antibodies establish that thyroid dysfunction, if it appears, is autoimmune in origin. They do not by themselves mean the gland is failing now, and a positive TPO with a normal TSH is generally watched rather than treated.
What they change is prognosis. In long-term follow-up data a raised TSH and positive antibodies each increased the odds of progressing to overt hypothyroidism, and the two together increased it far more, with a notably larger effect in men. In practice that means a closer monitoring interval, and how close is a decision for your clinician.
Every claim above that is not a definition is either labelled by evidence tier or carries a numbered reference to one of these.
TherapyLog logs this marker with the unit, the reference interval your report printed and the assay method beside it, so a trend cannot silently switch methods on you.
Log your bloodworkThis calculator does the arithmetic you typed and nothing else. It does not know what is actually in your vial, whether the label is accurate, or anything about you. Confirm the vial strength and the diluent volume on your own label before you draw, and take dosing decisions to a qualified provider.