TherapyLog
HomeCompounds › SS-31

SS-31: a peptide that goes to the mitochondrion, and the trials that followed it there

Almost everything else in this reference acts on a receptor at the cell surface. This one accumulates inside the mitochondrion and binds a specific lipid there, which is a genuinely different kind of intervention and has a genuinely different evidence base.

Last reviewed: 4 September 2026

Regulatory status. Phase II clinical trials ongoing (Barth syndrome, heart failure). Not FDA approved. Research compound. That is the app’s own field, reproduced here rather than summarised. It means no regulator has reviewed a manufacturer’s evidence for identity, purity, potency or safety in people for this compound, so nothing below is a marketing claim about a product you can buy.

Purity, identity and concentration are therefore unverified by anyone but whoever made the vial. The storage rule in the fact box below is general practice for this formulation rather than a specification for a particular product: General handling practice for this formulation. Your supplier’s own insert or COA overrides anything here.

This page names no vendor, no clinic and no testing service, and there is no discount code anywhere on this site — the moment a page like this recommends where to buy, it stops being information.

Also known as
Elamipretide, MTP-131, Bendavia
Class
Peptide
Regulatory status
Phase II clinical trials ongoing (Barth syndrome, heart failure). Not FDA approved. Research compound.
Before mixing
Sealed powder tolerates room temperature in transit, but keep it refrigerated at 2–8 °C (36–46 °F) for anything beyond a few weeks, or frozen for months. Keep it dark — the carton it shipped in is doing a job.
After mixing
Once reconstituted with bacteriostatic water: refrigerate at 2–8 °C and use within about 28 days. The benzyl alcohol in bacteriostatic water is what buys that window — plain sterile water has no preservative, so a vial mixed with it should be treated as one sitting only. Kits are usually ten vials: only the one you mixed is on that 28-day clock — the sealed ones keep their own, much longer shelf life, so store them as powder, not as solution.
What ruins it
Do not freeze a reconstituted vial. Repeated freeze–thaw is one of the more reliable ways to degrade a peptide.
Handling caveat
General handling practice for this formulation. Your supplier’s own insert or COA overrides anything here.

Cardiolipin, and why targeting it makes sense

Established clinical use Cardiolipin is a phospholipid found almost exclusively in the inner mitochondrial membrane, where it shapes the cristae and organises the electron transport chain complexes into functional supercomplexes. When cardiolipin is damaged — by oxidation, or by a genetic defect in the enzyme that remodels it — the membrane architecture degrades, electron transport becomes inefficient, and the mitochondrion leaks more reactive oxygen species, which damages more cardiolipin. It is a self-reinforcing failure.

SS-31, also called elamipretide, is a four-amino-acid peptide with an alternating aromatic-cationic structure that causes it to concentrate in the inner mitochondrial membrane at concentrations far above the surrounding cytosol, where it associates with cardiolipin. The proposed effect is to stabilise the architecture and interrupt that cycle. Animal-only or theoretical Preclinical work across ischaemia-reperfusion, heart failure and age-related mitochondrial decline supports it consistently.

What the human trials found

Established clinical use This compound has had a real clinical programme, which distinguishes it sharply from most research peptides. It has been studied in primary mitochondrial myopathy, in Barth syndrome — a rare genetic disorder of cardiolipin remodelling, which is about as clean a test of the mechanism as biology offers — and in heart failure and other indications.

The results have been mixed rather than triumphant. A phase III trial in primary mitochondrial myopathy did not meet its primary endpoint. The Barth syndrome work, conducted in a very small population with extension data, produced signals that the sponsor pursued toward approval. Heart failure trials have not delivered a clear positive. The overall picture is a well-founded mechanism that has been hard to convert into endpoints, which is a common outcome for mitochondrial therapeutics and not a disqualification of the idea.

That is a far more informative position than "promising preclinical data", and it is the reason this page can say something concrete. It also means the longevity framing — which the app’s entry reflects — runs ahead of the evidence: nothing in the programme measured ageing, and the populations studied had specific diseases.

What is available, and what it costs to be wrong

Animal-only or theoretical There is no approved product. What is available is research-supply material, and for a compound whose entire function depends on a precise aromatic-cationic sequence reaching an intracellular compartment, purity is not a peripheral concern. This site names no vendor and no testing service. The app’s own drawbacks list flags sourcing and expense before anything else, which is the right ordering.

The app records no half-life or time to peak, because none is published for the preparations in circulation, which is why the fact box above has no pharmacokinetic rows. It also records no meaningful monitoring: there is no blood test that reflects mitochondrial function well enough to follow a trend against, and the honest assessment markers are exercise capacity and how you actually feel, measured the same way each time.

The dosing rows above include a performance-framed entry that survives this site’s filters, and it is worth saying that nothing in the trial programme studied that use. The amounts in trials were set for disease indications under monitoring that does not exist outside one. Anyone considering this should be having that conversation with a clinician who knows their cardiac history in particular, given where the trials were run.

The dosing rows the app records

Off-label or community practice Reproduced from the app’s reference so you can see what it holds, not as a recommendation. Which row applies to a particular person, if any, is a clinical decision this page does not make — and rows describing supraphysiological or post-cycle use are filtered out before this table is built, so what you see here is a subset.

LabelAmountRoute and frequencyDuration recorded
Longevity and Mitochondrial5-10mgSubQ 3-5x weekly4-8 weeks on / 4 weeks off
Clinical trial dose4mg/kg IV in trialsPhysician administeredStudy protocol
Research Protocol1–3mg/daySubQ injection4–12 weeks

What the app monitors alongside it

The panel below is the app’s own monitoring note for SS-31, verbatim. None of the analytes it names has a page here yet.

Monitoring panel
Energy levels and exercise capacity self-assessment. VO2 max testing if available. No standard blood monitoring protocol established.

Drawbacks and risks the app records

From the app’s own entry, and it is honest: cost, sourcing and the absence of established dosing are the practical barriers, ahead of any adverse effect.

That list is the app’s, not a complete adverse-effect profile, and none of it is a diagnosis. Anything on it that you are actually experiencing belongs in front of the clinician who prescribes or supervises for you — they are the only person who can weigh it against your history, your other medications and your bloodwork.

Interaction rules that name SS-31

From the app’s interaction data, filtered so no rule naming a compound this site does not publish appears. Not exhaustive, and not a safety clearance: a combination that is not listed is one nobody has documented here, which is not the same as one that is fine. The combination checker has the rest.

Worth knowing

SS-31 + MOTS-c — Comprehensive Mitochondrial Stack

SS-31 targets the inner mitochondrial membrane (cardiolipin) while MOTS-c activates AMPK and nuclear gene expression. Together they address mitochondrial function at two distinct levels — membrane integrity and metabolic signaling.

What to watch: Energy and exercise capacity self-assessment, VO2 max if available, fasting glucose.

Questions people actually ask

Did the trials work?

Mixed. The phase III in primary mitochondrial myopathy missed its primary endpoint; the Barth syndrome work in a very small population produced signals the sponsor pursued; heart failure trials have not delivered a clear positive. A real programme with an unresolved result is still far more than most compounds here have.

Is it a longevity drug?

Nothing in the clinical programme measured ageing. The longevity framing comes from the mechanism — mitochondrial decline is a hallmark of ageing — and from preclinical work, not from a human outcome.

Why is there no half-life in the fact box?

Because the app holds none for the material in circulation. Duration figures quoted elsewhere are not coming from a characterisation of what people are actually using.

What should be monitored?

Nothing on a routine panel reflects mitochondrial function usefully. Exercise capacity measured consistently is the honest proxy, which means measuring it the same way each time rather than comparing impressions.

Where the load-bearing numbers come from

Named rather than linked. Publisher URLs move, and a citation that resolves to a 404 two years from now is worse than one you can search for by name — every entry below is findable from the title and year alone.

Cardiolipin in inner membrane architecture
Established mitochondrial biochemistry
Mitochondrial accumulation of the aromatic-cationic peptide
The elamipretide pharmacology literature
Clinical programme outcomes
Trials in primary mitochondrial myopathy, Barth syndrome and heart failure, reported from 2018 onward, with mixed results
Absence of pharmacokinetic data
app.html holds no half-life or time-to-peak entry for this compound, which is why no such rows appear above

With no marker to follow, a consistent measure of what you can actually do is the whole dataset. TherapyLog keeps it beside the dose.

Save this dose to your log

Built by Joel Gonzales, founder of TherapyLog. Not a clinician. Last reviewed 4 September 2026. The calculator on this page runs the same code as the app; how these pages are written, sourced and corrected is set out in the editorial policy.

TherapyLog is an informational tracking tool and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before starting, changing, or stopping any medical protocol.
TherapyLog LLC · Floresville, Texas · Privacy Policy · Consumer Health Data · Terms of Use · About · hello@therapylog.app